A former MK soldier who objected to other inmates joining Janusz Waluś’s Constitutional Court parole petition is believed to be the person who stabbed him.
The inmate was angry that the group sided with Chris Hani’s killer, saying they couldn’t be on the same side as the person who killed their comrade…
The man accused of stabbing Janusz Walus in Kgosi Mampuru prison is currently serving a life sentence for the murder and wounding of a South African air force lieutenant colonel another in 2007 after failing the officer course a second time.
The man accused of stabbing Walus, 69, in the upper body on Tuesday afternoon, is a former SA Air Force sergeant who was stationed at Thaba Tshwane Air Force College in Pretoria where he worked in the Human Resources Department.
Madonsela was sentenced to life imprisonment after being found guilty of the murder of Lt. Col. Authon Dominic Stevens and the attempted murder of Lt. Col. Isak Karan on November 8, 2007. Stevens died of gunshot wounds to chest and heart, while Karan was shot three times. times but survived.
Madonsela, who was convicted in 2010, pleaded not guilty to the charges of murder and attempted murder. He claimed he was never in Stevens’ office, as he shot Karan in self-defense.
This is despite the overwhelming evidence presented, including forensic evidence that three bullet fragments removed from Stevens’ body were fired from Madonsela’s gun. The court also heard testimony that Madonsela was seen leaving Steven’s office immediately after the gunshots.
The firearm used in the commission of the crime was voluntarily turned over to the police by Madonsela shortly after the shooting. However, he insisted that a mistake had been made in the ballistics report.
Madonsela further claimed that it was called the k-word by Karan.
The Gauteng High Court in Pretoria rejected Madonsela’s version of events and eventually convicted him in 2011.
How is he going to violate his parole conditions if he’s not here?
The parole, for this one, is 2 years. During this time he is not allowed to commit an offense similar to the one for which he was convicted, to possess a firearm or to fraternize with known criminals … now I doubt he knows who is a criminal in Poland, he probably won’t be able to get a gun there and it’s unlikely there’s anyone he wants to murder there.
All of this is costing us, the taxpayers, money that could be used to protect law-abiding citizens instead of giving them a 24-hour personal protection service.
