South African Minister Gayton McKenzie Accused of Racism
South African Sports, Arts, and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie is facing intense scrutiny over alleged racist remarks aimed at black South Africans. The controversy surrounds old social media posts, some dating back to 2013, where McKenzie used derogatory language and apartheid-era slurs to South Africans of African descent.
Reactions from ActionSA and ATM
ActionSA has lodged a formal complaint with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), calling for accountability and action against McKenzie. The party’s MP, Alan Beesley, stated that McKenzie’s comments are “purely racist and degrading” and that no reasonable person can defend them.
The African Transformation Movement (ATM) has also demanded an investigation into McKenzie’s remarks and his removal from office. ATM parliamentary leader Vuyo Zungula emphasized that the issue is not about political rivalry but about ethics, constitutional duty, and the moral fabric of the Republic.
Constitutional and Ethical Implications
The complaint against McKenzie invokes several constitutional sections and ethics codes, including Sections 1(b), 9, 10, and 195(1)(e) and (i) of the Constitution, the Executive Members’ Ethics Act, and the Parliamentary Code of Conduct. Zungula argued that McKenzie’s continued tenure undermines his office and Parliament, damaging public trust.
Calls for Action
ActionSA and ATM are pushing for immediate action, including a thorough investigation and potential removal of McKenzie from his ministerial post. They argue that an unrepentant Minister cannot credibly lead a department tasked with building cultural bridges and fostering unity.
This developing story is sparking intense debate about racism, accountability, and leadership in South Africa.
